JJ Newberry began as a family enterprise, with J. J. Newberry assuming management duties alongside his brothers, C.T. and Edgar in 1919. At that point, the company boasted 17 stores with an annual revenue of $500,000.

Newberry’s Expansion

Over time, the Newberry chain expanded through the acquisition of additional stores, including Hested in Wyoming, Missouri, Ohio, North Dakota, Colorado, and Nebraska, as well as Lee Stores in South Dakota, Minnesota, Maine, and Iowa. At the time of founder J.J. Newberry’s passing in 1954, the chain had grown to 475 stores. By 1961, the company operated 565 stores with a total annual sales figure of $291 million, and it also managed a larger department store named Britt’s Department Store.

J. J. Newberry Acquisitions

In 1972, McCrory Stores acquired the 439-unit J. J. Newberry Co., continuing to operate it as a separate division under the Newberry banner. McCrory Stores expanded the Newberry presence, particularly in the Northeast and California. While thriving in the 1980s, the company faced challenges in the early 1990s and eventually filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 1992.

In 1997, McCrory closed 300 stores, including many in the Newberry’s division, though some remained. By the year 2000, most remaining Newberry’s and other McCrory-branded five and dime stores had transitioned to the Dollar Zone brand, as McCrory’s sought to overhaul its business model. The remaining Newberry stores, along with the entire McCrory’s chain, closed in February 2002.

J. J. Newberry: The Early Days

Early J. J. Newberry stores featured a distinctive logo, typically in gold or white sans-serif letters on a red background that spanned the entire width of the store facade. This design was reminiscent of the early signage of competitors such as Woolworth’s, Neisner Brothers, and the S. S. Kresge. Subsequent stores adopted a cursive 1960s modern logo style, omitting the “J. J.” altogether.

Why Did J.J. Newberry Fail?

The decline and eventual failure of J. J. Newberry can be attributed to a combination of factors that affected the retail landscape during the latter half of the 20th century. Here are some key reasons for the downfall of J. J. Newberry:

1. Changing Retail Landscape: The retail industry underwent significant changes during the latter half of the 20th century, with the rise of larger discount and department store chains. This change in consumer preferences and shopping patterns had an impact on traditional five-and-dime stores like J. J. Newberry.
2. Competition from Larger Chains: The expansion of larger retail chains, such as Walmart and Target, posed stiff competition to smaller stores like J. J. Newberry. These larger chains could offer a broader range of products at competitive prices, drawing customers away from smaller, specialized stores.
3. Strategic Challenges: McCrory Stores, which acquired J. J. Newberry in 1972, faced strategic challenges in the early 1990s. The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 1992, indicating financial difficulties and an inability to adapt to changing market conditions.
4. Store Closures and Rebranding: In response to financial challenges, McCrory Stores closed a significant number of stores, including many in the Newberry’s division, in 1997. The attempt to rebrand remaining stores under the Dollar Zone name in 2000 was part of a broader effort to change the business model, but it was not successful in revitalizing the brand.
5. Economic Downturns: Economic downturns in the early 1990s may have contributed to reduced consumer spending, impacting the retail sector as a whole. This economic environment would have affected the profitability of stores like J. J. Newberry.
6. Failure to Evolve: Some retailers failed to adapt to changing consumer preferences, technological advancements, and the overall evolution of the retail industry. Failure to embrace new trends and technologies can lead to a loss of relevance and competitiveness.

In summary, the demise of J. J. Newberry was a result of a combination of industry shifts, increased competition from larger chains, strategic challenges within the parent company, and a failure to adapt to changing consumer and economic dynamics.

Please leave your comments in the “Leave a Reply” section at the bottom of this page